Rank: Guest
Groups: Registered
Joined: 04/07/2015(UTC) Posts: 6,868 Was thanked: 980 time(s) in 808 post(s)
|
Polyroots is abundantly reported to fail. For sure, it does not understand the canonical cubic, from which canonical the 3 roots are extracted and reconstructed via Lagrange roots form. Smath is slightly pregnant to plot Lagrange complex roots [only some months of pregnancy]. In Process Control & Instrumentation, the PI & PID modes have only a vector of 3 coefficients, that represent the canonical cubic involved in the Laplace solution. Polyroots fail to solve the canonical. The cubic canonical is reconstructed via the Lagrange roots factor. These two companions are inseparable birds. Note that roots of orthogonal polynomial aren't done via polyroots, they have their own solution [see Abramowitz & Stegun]. Mathcad 11 OK. If you read the attached document, you will discover that if you want to use polyroots on the example, you will have to teach user to split 3 cats to get 4 cats. No problem to get 4 delicatessen out of 3 cats, but you have no more cat.
|
1 user thanked Jean Giraud for this useful post.
|
|
|
Forum Jump
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.