SMath Studio Forum
»
SMath Studio
»
Bugs & Problems
»
[SS-2301] i as argument in a function
  Rank: Advanced Member Groups: Registered, Advanced Member Joined: 13/01/2012(UTC) Posts: 2,725   Location: Italy Was thanked: 1393 time(s) in 909 post(s)
|
Confirmed. Considering that e and pi can be used as function's argument, IMHO should be considered a bug. Edited by user 27 May 2016 14:07:36(UTC)
| Reason: marked as fixed |
If you like my plugins consider to support SMath Studio buying a plan; to offer me a coffee: paypal.me/dcprojects |
 1 user thanked Davide Carpi for this useful post.
|
|
|
|
 Rank: Guest
Groups: Registered
Joined: 04/07/2015(UTC) Posts: 6,866  Was thanked: 983 time(s) in 811 post(s)
|
Several months ago I reported that if 'i' imaginary
belongs to a function definition, 'i' can NOT be used
as index in program. Worst, the program runs but zombie.
Conflict/bug is cnfirmed. Toke me days to elucidate.
Jean
|
2 users thanked Jean Giraud for this useful post.
|
on 03/03/2016(UTC), on 03/03/2016(UTC)
|
|
|
  Rank: Administration Groups: Registered, Advanced Member Joined: 23/06/2009(UTC) Posts: 1,740  Was thanked: 318 time(s) in 268 post(s)
|
Please look at this link, for instance. Regards, Radovan |
When Sisyphus climbed to the top of a hill, they said: "Wrong boulder!" |
1 user thanked omorr for this useful post.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Administration Groups: Registered, Advanced Member Joined: 23/06/2009(UTC) Posts: 1,740 Was thanked: 318 time(s) in 268 post(s)
|
Originally Posted by: ioan92  Thanks Radovan,
Nothing new under the sun, and Sisyphus is doing conscientiously his work...
Best Regards,
Ioan
You are welcome Ioan  . It is important that our Sisyphus is in good health  Regards, Radovan |
When Sisyphus climbed to the top of a hill, they said: "Wrong boulder!" |
2 users thanked omorr for this useful post.
|
on 03/03/2016(UTC), on 03/03/2016(UTC)
|
|
|
Rank: Advanced Member Groups: Registered, Advanced Member Joined: 13/01/2012(UTC) Posts: 2,725 Location: Italy Was thanked: 1393 time(s) in 909 post(s)
|
Originally Posted by: ioan92 Maybe we could think a way to solve, making periodically some synthesis or similar ? I think that the BTS was thinked for this purpose, one may add a link to the discussion thread if is something discussed in the forum Reading the link provided by Radovan seems there are strong reasons code side, still is something that may cause confusion because in the canvas i can be overriden...  |
If you like my plugins consider to support SMath Studio buying a plan; to offer me a coffee: paypal.me/dcprojects |
1 user thanked Davide Carpi for this useful post.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
Groups: Registered
Joined: 04/07/2015(UTC) Posts: 6,866 Was thanked: 983 time(s) in 811 post(s)
|
... use (j,k,n) in lieu.
expx(i*x) [i imaginary] will crash Smath
if i [index] to collect exp(,)
|
1 user thanked Jean Giraud for this useful post.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Administration Groups: Registered, Advanced Member Joined: 23/06/2009(UTC) Posts: 1,740 Was thanked: 318 time(s) in 268 post(s)
|
Originally Posted by: ioan92 Radovan, I think that it is not good at all if a lot of observations are lost over the time. Many of this was obtained with much work. For this simple history with "i" I spent a lot of time, making firstly reproaches to myself. It is clear that such a work is not to be assigned to Andrey. He gives us too much of himself. After many years, the volume of the forum is big enough, being almost impossible to look inside for each problem. Maybe we could think a way to solve, making periodically some synthesis or similar ? Best Regards,
Ioan Hello Ioan, I do not know how to do this right way, but during all these years I think this is inevitable. We are just forgetting things and rediscover them again, and there might be expected to be that way. Speaking for myself, it happens to me quite often (maybe because I am not getting any younger ) . I agree that the volume of this Forum is quite large, lots of similar things are scattered all over the topics, and I really do not know how to put some order or synthesis of it, as you said. Regards, Radovan |
When Sisyphus climbed to the top of a hill, they said: "Wrong boulder!" |
1 user thanked omorr for this useful post.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
Groups: Registered
Joined: 04/07/2015(UTC) Posts: 6,866 Was thanked: 983 time(s) in 811 post(s)
|
Originally Posted by: omorr I do not know how to do this right way, but during all these years I think this is inevitable. We are just forgetting things and rediscover them again, and there might be expected to be that way. Speaking for myself, it happens to me quite often (maybe because I am not getting any younger ) . I agree that the volume of this Forum is quite large, lots of similar things are scattered all over the topics, and I really do not know how to put some order or synthesis of it, as you said. Radovan !!! You are number 1 +++ WebMaster. You can trust me from 10 years Mathsoft Collaboratory. Their forum was not bad searching by: keyword, by date, by name. Since I joined, nothing was left unattended or not doctored in one way or another. Real user needing help will come back after re-thinking for a better targeted question. Cheers, Jean
|
2 users thanked Jean Giraud for this useful post.
|
on 04/03/2016(UTC), on 04/03/2016(UTC)
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
Groups: Registered
Joined: 04/07/2015(UTC) Posts: 6,866 Was thanked: 983 time(s) in 811 post(s)
|
.... "i as an arguent in function" is simply not documented.
"i" is by defunition the imaginary. Naturally it can't be
used otherwise except within the core of a program as long
as there is no complex stuff in the work sheet.
Sierpinski from today "Uni" is all correct from educated
know how [Ah ! the learning curve ]. Albert Einstein
missed twice his entry to University. Why not some of us ?
Jean
|
2 users thanked Jean Giraud for this useful post.
|
on 04/03/2016(UTC), on 04/03/2016(UTC)
|
|
|
 Rank: Advanced Member Groups: Registered
Joined: 17/01/2013(UTC) Posts: 296  Location: Khabarovsk, Russia Was thanked: 151 time(s) in 107 post(s)
|
When i is used inside functions, it disallows the function to correctly process complex numbers (without redefining i outside the function):  |
Best regards,
Mike Kaganski |
|
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
Groups: Registered
Joined: 04/07/2015(UTC) Posts: 6,866 Was thanked: 983 time(s) in 811 post(s)
|
Originally Posted by: mikekaganski When i is used inside functions,
it disallows the function to correctly process complex numbers
(without redefining i outside the function): Quite right Mike, in numericals we have to learn few things like learning alphabet. It made me shit bricks while working the Laplace in closed control loops... i:=sqrt(-1) Jean
|
|
|
|
|
|
 Rank: Administration Groups: Developers, Registered, Knovel Developers, Administrators, Advanced Member Joined: 11/07/2008(UTC) Posts: 1,636 Was thanked: 2007 time(s) in 677 post(s)
|
Question related to using "i" as function's argument reviewed.
Now it is possible. New nightly build will be available soon.
|
|
|
|
|
|
SMath Studio Forum
»
SMath Studio
»
Bugs & Problems
»
[SS-2301] i as argument in a function
Forum Jump
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.
