SMath Studio Forum
»
SMath Studio
»
Questions
»
That damned Trifolium makes me sick !
Rank: Guest
Groups: Registered
Joined: 04/07/2015(UTC) Posts: 6,868 Was thanked: 980 time(s) in 808 post(s)
|
Can't explain why yesterday I got a clean Trifolium, today it returns crappy again. It puzzled me for quite a while. I don't lie ... proof => clean InterseX posted last night. Made a backup last night, crappy today, Ah ! Why that 0 junction from stack(,,,) where there is none from construction ? It looks like the story of the last candy in the box and "Momy's cat". Worst than Murphy's law ! 2D Parametric Plot [Create Trifolium].sm (63kb) downloaded 27 time(s). ... Smath 6179
|
|
|
|
Rank: Advanced Member Groups: Registered
Joined: 15/07/2010(UTC) Posts: 437 Location: Beer-Sheva Was thanked: 520 time(s) in 288 post(s)
|
The files differ in the value of N, in the first file N = 100, and in the second file N = 30.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
Groups: Registered
Joined: 04/07/2015(UTC) Posts: 6,868 Was thanked: 980 time(s) in 808 post(s)
|
Originally Posted by: Ber7 The files differ in the value of N, in the first file N = 100, and in the second file N = 30. ... yesterday it doctored itself by coincidence during many attempts. This version is doctored [gray 235 ... can't explain . In short shadow in context ... occasional Mathcad/Mathematica. "shadow in context" is Mathematica expression of code can't be doctored. 2D Parametric Plot [Create Trifolium] Copy.sm (37kb) downloaded 18 time(s). ... doctored 6179
|
|
|
|
Rank: Advanced Member Groups: Registered
Joined: 15/07/2010(UTC) Posts: 437 Location: Beer-Sheva Was thanked: 520 time(s) in 288 post(s)
|
Jean, it seems to me that in the for operator there should be not N, but N + 1.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
Groups: Registered
Joined: 04/07/2015(UTC) Posts: 6,868 Was thanked: 980 time(s) in 808 post(s)
|
Originally Posted by: Ber7 Jean, it seems to me that in the for operator there should be not N, but N 1. Module xd(L,H,N) has fixed bounds [L, H], 'N' sets the number of calculated values, including the bounds. It has nothing to do with the "bug". The attached highlights the bug. Anything you code depend upon invisible/borrowed codes. This one may not appears in newer versions from newer sub-codes. Enable/disable => observe the Trifolium plot below. The Shadow in Context is between the triplet stack(f1,f2,f3) and the residual reverse[v,V4]. Conclusively: should be tested with more recent than SS 6179. It may suggest to get reverse & stack codes from other sources. It does not seems to be dependent upon the line code. 2D Parametric Plot [Create Trifolium] Copy.sm (38kb) downloaded 22 time(s).
|
|
|
|
SMath Studio Forum
»
SMath Studio
»
Questions
»
That damned Trifolium makes me sick !
Forum Jump
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.