Welcome Guest! To enable all features please Login. New Registrations are disabled.

Notification

Icon
Error

Login


Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
Offline Ushwood  
#1 Posted : 14 August 2018 13:43:15(UTC)
Ushwood

Rank: Newbie

Groups: Registered
Joined: 14/08/2018(UTC)
Posts: 1
Russian Federation

I have a system of n equations with m variables. Can SMath solve it approximately? Like, for example, MathCAD can with MinErr function.

Wanna join the discussion?! Login to your SMath Studio Forum forum account. New Registrations are disabled.

Offline Jean Giraud  
#2 Posted : 14 August 2018 16:41:03(UTC)
Jean Giraud

Rank: Guest

Groups: Registered
Joined: 04/07/2015(UTC)
Posts: 6,868
Canada

Was thanked: 980 time(s) in 808 post(s)
Originally Posted by: Ushwood Go to Quoted Post
I have a system of n equations with m variables.
Can SMath solve it approximately ?
Like, for example, MathCAD can with MinErr function.


Answer is YES as long as your "m variables" are "m parameters"
and that you set a system of "m equalities" among the 'n' data sets
That's how it works in Smath 6179 previous to 6671.

1. The pure parabolic example can be made slightly noisy to reflect
experimental data collected. In that case, al_nleqsolve will rougly
get passage at the support points. Further, Genfit Conjugate Gradient
will refine on SSD.

2. The other project concludes a long collaboration in this Forum.
From a 7 parameters model, it like averages a set of 7 parameters
that will satisfy the 9 sets of data. Unfortunately, the data sets
don't belong to an homogeneous family.

All in all: Smath has done same as Mathcad 11 for > 100 fitting
sessions. In many of these sessions Smath is declared superior to MCD.

Jean

Genfit al_ nleqsolve DIDACTIC.sm (79kb) downloaded 26 time(s).
Solve al_nleqsolve Ber7_Nicolas [6179] RECONCILIATION Copy.sm (81kb) downloaded 28 time(s).
Offline Jean Giraud  
#3 Posted : 15 August 2018 04:29:46(UTC)
Jean Giraud

Rank: Guest

Groups: Registered
Joined: 04/07/2015(UTC)
Posts: 6,868
Canada

Was thanked: 980 time(s) in 808 post(s)
Originally Posted by: Jean Giraud Go to Quoted Post
1. The pure parabolic example can be made slightly noisy to reflect
experimental data collected. In that case, al_nleqsolve will rougly
get passage at the support points. Further, Genfit Conjugate Gradient
will refine on SSD.


This is not true: al_nleqsolve will not roughly find solutions.
Probably caused by the hyper-reflexive model.
Genfit will find adequate parameters to the noisy data set,
but diverges at the 3rd iterate.

Jean

Genfit al_ nleqsolve DIDACTIC.sm (85kb) downloaded 27 time(s). ... updated
Users browsing this topic
Forum Jump  
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.