Rank: Advanced Member Groups: Registered
Joined: 15/04/2012(UTC) Posts: 2,035 Was thanked: 1165 time(s) in 745 post(s)
|
Here is another example, where an quite ordinary task hits the number representation limit. However, in the given example I don't see the solution in longer number format but in a smarter det computation algorithm. Edit: failed to add attachments, don't know why. Thus I try it this way: SMath fails to evaluate (numerically) rank and det of the following matrix. The rank is 10 and the det is in the order of 10^10. The problem is in the intermediate results of the algorithm. Symbolic optimization gives the correct rank but the det is still just a big expression. A:mat(8,0,4,8,8,2,8,3,3,2,5,3,0,7,4,7,5,4,6,7,5,8,4,1,8,3,1,8,6,9,6,3,5,0,0,3,8,9,8,0,5,8,3,5,8,3,4,6,6,5,9,6,7,2,8,9,6,3,9,5,1,9,6,4,5,1,8,0,6,1,9,5,5,5,1,7,5,8,2,4,8,4,2,1,9,9,5,2,1,1,6,5,9,3,9,5,1,8,0,7,10,10)Edited by user 08 May 2013 17:30:21(UTC)
| Reason: Not specified |