Seems to work (slowly) this way:

FILON DEVELOLPMENT TESTING_b.sm (150kb) downloaded 14 time(s).

Thanks guys for your helpful input. I will give it a try.
Being a brute force type of programmer, in the meantime, I decided to try something. I created a second calculation at negative times using the range variable as before. Now, I have a positive time and a negative time result from which to calculate the even and odd parts. The results are shown in the attached PDF for 30 time points per decade and 100 frequency points per decade. These definitions are in the blue area for time and orange area for frequency.

SMATH FILON TRANSFORM.pdf (628kb) downloaded 13 time(s).

With the increased time and frequency points per decade, it runs for almost 4.5 minutes. The transform is very good. If I keep the original time and frequency points per decade = 10 as in my original submittal, it runs for 7.6 seconds; however, the transform is not very good as shown in this figure.



If interested, the full code equivalent to the PDF is provided here. Auto Calculate is turned off.

FILON DEVELOLPMENT.sm (198kb) downloaded 4 time(s).

The advantage of the Filon method is that it does not require evenly spaced time or frequency points over the entire range of the transform. This is very useful for problems that range for 10^-10 seconds to tens of minutes (e.g., High Altitude EMP coupling to systems which include the very late time MHD signal, which is comparable to the most severe geomagnetic storms). In addition, how well the even and odd functions agree is a measure of how good the transform is.

Just an FYI, in MATHCAD 15 this calculation runs for only one minute for 100 time points per decade and 300 frequency points per decade to give an extremely good transform.

Three lasting issues:
1. The transforms should be real as in MATHCAD. In SMATH they are complex; therefore, I plotted the absolute value as a sort of workaround. Have not had the energy to work through the algebra to prove the transform should be real.
2. Is there anyway in SMATH to include the text about spacing h and frequency points per decade on top of the graph? I placed it below because it always appeared under the graph if I tried to place it on top of the graph.
3. The graph is a ZED Graph. Is there anyway to express the y-axis with exponential notation without resorting to a log scale?

Thanks again for you help. I will try your methods.
Reg