Welcome Guest! To enable all features please Login. New Registrations are disabled.

Notification

Icon
Error

Login


Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
Offline Jean Giraud  
#1 Posted : 19 August 2017 17:33:35(UTC)
Jean Giraud

Rank: Guest

Groups: Registered
Joined: 04/07/2015(UTC)
Posts: 6,868
Canada

Was thanked: 980 time(s) in 808 post(s)
This document exposes 3 conflicting codes.
Exposed @ big arrow.
Developers => for your interest.

Integrate_4 [Conflict Sum series].sm (48kb) downloaded 20 time(s).

Wanna join the discussion?! Login to your SMath Studio Forum forum account. New Registrations are disabled.

Offline Davide Carpi  
#2 Posted : 19 August 2017 19:08:08(UTC)
Davide Carpi


Rank: Advanced Member

Groups: Registered, Advanced Member
Joined: 13/01/2012(UTC)
Posts: 2,639
Man
Italy
Location: Italy

Was thanked: 1323 time(s) in 873 post(s)
Hello Jean,

About the "n - not defined", it is because you have to nest the second sum in the first, otherwise n is (correctly) undefined. Other things to check later... Thank you for the works as well as the references!

While written correctly, you should be able to highlight the outer sum argument like in this picture:
2017-08-19 18_03_26-SMath Studio - [Integrate_4%20[Conflict%20Sum%20series].sm_].png
If you like my plugins consider to support SMath Studio buying a plan; to offer me a coffee: paypal.me/dcprojects
Offline Jean Giraud  
#3 Posted : 23 August 2017 05:31:58(UTC)
Jean Giraud

Rank: Guest

Groups: Registered
Joined: 04/07/2015(UTC)
Posts: 6,868
Canada

Was thanked: 980 time(s) in 808 post(s)
Thanks Davide for doctoring Ramanujan

Here is the working Logarithmic Li(x)

Jean

Maths Special LogarithmicIntegral(x).sm (17kb) downloaded 16 time(s).
Users browsing this topic
Forum Jump  
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.