SMath Studio Forum
»
SMath Studio
»
Questions
»
Chain Failure Weibull Analysis
Rank: Advanced Member Groups: Registered
Joined: 28/08/2014(UTC) Posts: 1,356 Was thanked: 815 time(s) in 516 post(s)
|
Hi. NM algorithm with restrictions. Best regards. Alvaro Weibull3.sm (50kb) downloaded 20 time(s).
|
|
|
|
Rank: Advanced Member Groups: Registered
Joined: 29/11/2017(UTC) Posts: 82 Location: Midwest Was thanked: 9 time(s) in 7 post(s)
|
Thanks Alvaro!
Interesting. The data's outcome can be configured to look based on the limit: beta>1 or beta<1. Which one is correct? More for me to ponder...
Norm
|
|
|
|
Rank: Advanced Member Groups: Registered
Joined: 28/08/2014(UTC) Posts: 1,356 Was thanked: 815 time(s) in 516 post(s)
|
Originally Posted by: nasch Thanks Alvaro!
Interesting. The data's outcome can be configured to look based on the limit: beta>1 or beta<1. Which one is correct? More for me to ponder...
Norm Hi Norm. You can see Weibull not as a probability distribution but a family of them. When you choose a probability distribution is because someone else says that it holds for your project because he study a lot of problems seeing which one is the"correct". Question about which model is better is about which model is preferable for your 230 units: the beta < 1 sub family or the other. This information usually is given by the units manufacturer. Hope this helps. Best regards. Alvaro.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
Groups: Registered
Joined: 04/07/2015(UTC) Posts: 6,866 Was thanked: 981 time(s) in 809 post(s)
|
Originally Posted by: nasch Interesting. The data's outcome can be configured to look based on the limit: beta More I read this more confused I get: The life cycle analysis starts with n=130 units under test for time_test=499 days. Several units fail. What is the probability that the ith unit will fail at time T hours. Use a Weibull probability destiny distribution function. The family of rate distribution functions is given by T: Time to failure in days.As it looks to me: it's an exercise from undocumented lecture, thus expressed in terms of incomplete understanding of what's needed for expressing results. Your explanation just says: failures were observe over 499 days observed @ T days. The missing link seems which one of the 130 unit failed ? Stat Treasury_8 Weibull FailureAnalysis] Copy.sm (23kb) downloaded 5 time(s).
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
Groups: Registered
Joined: 04/07/2015(UTC) Posts: 6,866 Was thanked: 981 time(s) in 809 post(s)
|
Originally Posted by: Jean Giraud More I read this more confused I get: ... more to read to de-confuse myself. When reading papers, if I don't see the step by step of the mathematical analysis, reproducible steps by steps on CAS, the writer writes for the birds. Stat Treasury_8 Weibull FailureAnalysis] Copy.sm (30kb) downloaded 8 time(s).
|
|
|
|
Rank: Advanced Member Groups: Registered
Joined: 28/08/2014(UTC) Posts: 1,356 Was thanked: 815 time(s) in 516 post(s)
|
Originally Posted by: Jean Giraud Originally Posted by: Jean Giraud More I read this more confused I get: Hi Jean. Units fails, but not dead nor disappear. They can be replaced or repaired. Norma's calculus is for planning the maintenance of the units for ensure some minimal critical number of them. For sure you can't allow only 1.47 units after 200 days, you do something for prevent that, this calculus just shows when you must to do that something. Depending of the kind of "units", this calculus also are for not overload the workshop, have enough replacements at the warehouse, ensure the reliability of the plant, and a long etc. Best regards. Alvaro.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Advanced Member Groups: Registered
Joined: 29/11/2017(UTC) Posts: 82 Location: Midwest Was thanked: 9 time(s) in 7 post(s)
|
Additional reading... A pdf that was linked from a MC file using a different method to determine beta and the SMATH translated worksheet. Norm Interestingly, using the method to determine beta on the "chain analysis" sheet figures a beta 0.77, much less than all the methods used earlier in this forum-topic-chain. kmath122.pdf (510kb) downloaded 13 time(s). Weibull Widgets.sm (72kb) downloaded 12 time(s).
|
|
|
|
Rank: Advanced Member Groups: Registered
Joined: 15/04/2012(UTC) Posts: 1,986 Was thanked: 1124 time(s) in 721 post(s)
|
Originally Posted by: nasch Additional reading... A pdf that was linked from a MC file using a different method to determine beta and the SMATH translated worksheet. Norm Interestingly, using the method to determine beta on the "chain analysis" sheet figures a beta 0.77, much less than all the methods used earlier in this forum-topic-chain. kmath122.pdf (510kb) downloaded 13 time(s). Weibull Widgets.sm (72kb) downloaded 12 time(s). The Maxima-based fit in post #9 gave a value of 0,8 which is not that far off 0,77. Which, of course, doesn't mean anything. |
|
|
|
|
Rank: Advanced Member Groups: Registered
Joined: 29/11/2017(UTC) Posts: 82 Location: Midwest Was thanked: 9 time(s) in 7 post(s)
|
Thanks Martin, It's good to have results that correlate, somewhat.
Norm
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
Groups: Registered
Joined: 04/07/2015(UTC) Posts: 6,866 Was thanked: 981 time(s) in 809 post(s)
|
|
|
|
|
SMath Studio Forum
»
SMath Studio
»
Questions
»
Chain Failure Weibull Analysis
Forum Jump
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.