SMath Studio Forum
»
SMath Studio
»
Questions
»
The Maxima Solver can't solve the symbolic equations
  Rank: Advanced Member Groups: Registered
Joined: 10/03/2020(UTC)
Posts: 67
Was thanked: 2 time(s) in 2 post(s)
|
  2.sm (4kb) downloaded 25 time(s).
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rank: Advanced Member Groups: Registered
Joined: 10/03/2020(UTC)
Posts: 67
Was thanked: 2 time(s) in 2 post(s)
|
Thanks Jean, Both a and alpha are unknows. the result of a and alpha are still includes these unknows. Only φ, R and m are knowns and can be used in the results. Edited by user 20 February 2022 03:44:48(UTC)
| Reason: Not specified
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rank: Advanced Member Groups: Registered
Joined: 10/03/2020(UTC)
Posts: 67
Was thanked: 2 time(s) in 2 post(s)
|
Thanks Jean, Buy you 2nd sybolic solution is the same as the 1st one. The solution should not include the unknow a and alpha My friend use Maple to get symbolic solution like this  You can see that in the solution of alpha, there is no a, in the solution of a, there is no alpha.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rank: Advanced Member Groups: Registered
Joined: 23/07/2013(UTC) Posts: 1,128  Was thanked: 509 time(s) in 339 post(s)
|
Symbolic solver of maxima is not that capable. As far as I know of course, maybe there is a simpler way. But this statement was what I had read about it. You have to use some substitutions for that solutions. And some extra division, arc functions, visa versa. Here is α solved symbolically in wxMaxima. Same method can be applicable for variable a. Regards untitled.wxmx.zip (2kb) downloaded 15 time(s).
|
 1 user thanked overlord for this useful post.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Advanced Member Groups: Registered
Joined: 23/07/2013(UTC) Posts: 1,128 Was thanked: 509 time(s) in 339 post(s)
|
Originally Posted by: Jean Giraud  Maxima and Maple have same ancestor Macyma This is a misinformation, you are wrong as usual Jean. Macsyma is not ancestor of Maple, or Maple is not a derivative of Macsyma. Those are totally different softwares, written in different programming languages. Written in different purpose, in different places by different people. Macsyma is written in LISP, Maple is in C and Java. It was developed to work on lower cost computers, entirely from scratch. It could run on cheap machines because of C, on the contrary of LISP. Maxima is written in LISP but it has a different background. Maxima is not a successor of Macsyma, it started as 1982 version of it. Macsyma is developed to 1999, than sold and not a version is released after. Maxima code was property of US Department of Energy, maintainer made it GPL in 1998. That code is being developed by independent maintainers since than, it is not just free but open-source. Maxima does not include any of the many modifications and enhancements made to the commercial version of Macsyma during 1982–1999. And that file at the end of you post, it tells nothing. Nothing about what the topic owners requests. Just a waste of server space and people's time.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rank: Advanced Member Groups: Registered
Joined: 10/03/2020(UTC)
Posts: 67
Was thanked: 2 time(s) in 2 post(s)
|
Is Maple plugin in Smath able to get symbolic results as Maxima does, but more easily?
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rank: Advanced Member Groups: Registered
Joined: 23/07/2013(UTC) Posts: 1,128 Was thanked: 509 time(s) in 339 post(s)
|
Originally Posted by: netsonicyxf Is Maple plugin in Smath able to get symbolic results as Maxima does, but more easily? Maple is easier to use, that is a fact. And sometimes it gives better results. But Maxima can surpass Maple at certain aspects. Use what suits your needs most. In the example below, I solved your function with Maple. Though it gives the results correct, result matrix is cripled. Copying and changing last bits of result " ;2;1)" to " ;2;2)" will correct the result. " ;" may differ to " ," according to your arguments separator. Regards Worksheet1.sm (16kb) downloaded 39 time(s).
|
1 user thanked overlord for this useful post.
|
|
|
|
Rank: Advanced Member Groups: Registered
Joined: 10/03/2020(UTC)
Posts: 67
Was thanked: 2 time(s) in 2 post(s)
|
Originally Posted by: overlord Originally Posted by: netsonicyxf Is Maple plugin in Smath able to get symbolic results as Maxima does, but more easily? Maple is easier to use, that is a fact. And sometimes it gives better results. But Maxima can surpass Maple at certain aspects. Use what suits your needs most. In the example below, I solved your function with Maple. Though it gives the results correct, result matrix is cripled. Copying and changing last bits of result " ;2;1)" to " ;2;2)" will correct the result. " ;" may differ to " ," according to your arguments separator. Regards Worksheet1.sm (16kb) downloaded 39 time(s). Hi overload, When I open you sm I get this error 
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rank: Advanced Member Groups: Registered
Joined: 10/03/2020(UTC)
Posts: 67
Was thanked: 2 time(s) in 2 post(s)
|
Originally Posted by: Jean Giraud ... is that what you are looking for ?  No The two equations should be put in one system.
|
|
|
|
|
|
 Rank: Advanced Member Groups: Registered
Joined: 27/03/2019(UTC) Posts: 75  Location: coah Was thanked: 27 time(s) in 22 post(s)
|
Originally Posted by: netsonicyxf Originally Posted by: overlord Originally Posted by: netsonicyxf Is Maple plugin in Smath able to get symbolic results as Maxima does, but more Hi overload, When I open you sm I get this error appears in red, because the evaluation must be symbolic. select the "result" variable, press the right button and in the type of evaluation select symbolic and that's it. I hope I have served you, greetings
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rank: Advanced Member Groups: Registered
Joined: 28/08/2014(UTC) Posts: 1,356  Was thanked: 815 time(s) in 516 post(s)
|
Hi. Another way, applying trigonometric identities. solve_trig.sm (13kb) downloaded 23 time(s). Best regards. Alvaro.
|
|
|
|
|
|
 Rank: Guest
Groups: Registered
Joined: 04/07/2015(UTC) Posts: 6,866  Was thanked: 981 time(s) in 809 post(s)
|
Originally Posted by: netsonicyxf Thanks Jean,
Both beta and alpha are unknown.
the result of beta and alpha still include these unknowns.
Onlyφ, R and m are known and can be used in the results. ... to be used as productive. Your system is baby stuff, example 2 advanced. I leave it there, not knowing more about your end demand. Simply a solved formula representation ??? Comment or ignore ... Jean. Solve ADVANCED Productive.sm (23kb) downloaded 12 time(s).
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rank: Guest
Groups: Registered
Joined: 04/07/2015(UTC) Posts: 6,866 Was thanked: 981 time(s) in 809 post(s)
|
Does it conclude something in that long journey ? 
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rank: Advanced Member Groups: Registered
Joined: 23/07/2013(UTC) Posts: 1,128 Was thanked: 509 time(s) in 339 post(s)
|
Originally Posted by: churichuro select the "result" variable, press the right button and in the type of evaluation select symbolic and that's it.
I hope I have served you, greetings Addition to churichuro's reply, use this simple function to correct maple plugin result matrices. Regards maplecorrect.sm (27kb) downloaded 72 time(s).
|
|
|
|
|
|
SMath Studio Forum
»
SMath Studio
»
Questions
»
The Maxima Solver can't solve the symbolic equations
Forum Jump
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.
